Post by Burkeomatic on May 2, 2023 2:28:37 GMT
Pending litigation.... just so you all know. I know it is BS, I don't like it, don't shoot the messenger. The main takeaway as related to Remote ID (RID), in addition to being a civil slapfight in the FAA kangaroo court (if they catch you) it will actually be a federal offence to alter, disable, or not implement RID.
Punishable by:
Of course if you even talk, threaten or think about it
Of course, the government doesn't have to follow their OWN rules.
Full text here. I hope everyone on here avoids full scale aircraft, doesn't fly in dumb places, and checks B4UFly before taking off so the rest shouldn't apply.
www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/157/text
IMPAIRMENT OF IDENTIFICATION OR LIGHTING.—It shall be unlawful to, in violation of Federal law, knowingly and willfully—
“(A) remove, obliterate, tamper with, or alter the identification number of the unmanned aircraft;
“(B) disable or fail to effect any required identification transmission or signaling of the unmanned aircraft; or
“(C) disable or obscure any required anti-collision lighting of the unmanned aircraft or fail to have or illuminate such lighting as required.
“(A) remove, obliterate, tamper with, or alter the identification number of the unmanned aircraft;
“(B) disable or fail to effect any required identification transmission or signaling of the unmanned aircraft; or
“(C) disable or obscure any required anti-collision lighting of the unmanned aircraft or fail to have or illuminate such lighting as required.
Punishable by:
Penalties.—Any person who violates subsection (b)—
“(1) in the case of a violation of paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of that subsection, shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined under this title, or both;
“(1) in the case of a violation of paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of that subsection, shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined under this title, or both;
Of course if you even talk, threaten or think about it
Inchoate Offenses.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Whoever threatens, attempts, or conspires to commit an offense under subsection (b) shall be subject to the same punishment under subsection (d) as for a completed offense.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Whoever threatens, attempts, or conspires to commit an offense under subsection (b) shall be subject to the same punishment under subsection (d) as for a completed offense.
Of course, the government doesn't have to follow their OWN rules.
Exceptions.—
“(1) GOVERNMENT-AUTHORIZED CONDUCT.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to conduct by or under the authority of, authorized by, or pursuant to a contract with, the United States or a State, Tribal, or local government, or any department or agency of the United States or a State, Tribal, or local government.
“(1) GOVERNMENT-AUTHORIZED CONDUCT.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to conduct by or under the authority of, authorized by, or pursuant to a contract with, the United States or a State, Tribal, or local government, or any department or agency of the United States or a State, Tribal, or local government.
Full text here. I hope everyone on here avoids full scale aircraft, doesn't fly in dumb places, and checks B4UFly before taking off so the rest shouldn't apply.
www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/157/text